EPA navigation

cleaner production case study
 

Container Reconditioning Services Pty Ltd

Summary

Traditional approach

Waste management

Cleaner production initiatives

Benefits

Where to find additional information

 

January 2001

Summary

The installation of a new, fully automated drum laundering line has greatly decreased the company's operating costs by reducing use and subsequent disposal of solvents, energy use and solid waste disposal costs while improving productivity. The far more efficient and safer process is saving the company over $10,000 per annum with a payback of only six and a half months.

Business Profile
CRS Container Reconditioning Services Pty Ltd is one of South Australia's largest drum reconditioners, holding approximately 50% of the South Australian market and a small portion of the Victorian, New South Wales and Northern Territory markets. The company proprietor began trading in used drums in 1991 as a sole operator before starting reconditioning operations at the present site in 1996. The company now employs 12 staff.

Financial assistance provided
An interest-free loan of $16,250 for purchase of the new equipment was provided by the EPA's Pollution Prevention Fund.

Technology implemented
A fully automatic drum laundering line.

Cleaner production motivators
To provide quality products and services to customers while reducing wastage and associated environmental costs.

Traditional approach

The reconditioning process cleans, and restores where necessary, 205 litre drums and 1000 litre intermediate bulk containers for re-use by the supplier or new customers. The open-and closed-head 205 litre drums had contained used oil, solvent, paint, surfactant, detergent, acid and caustic materials.

The previous inefficient method of reconditioning drums for re-use exposed employees to undesirable levels of solvent fumes and manual handling. Only 130 drums could be cleaned each day and some drums, such as those that contained resin, could not be reconditioned. Solvent disposal, energy, caustic soda and waste costs were extremely high.

Waste management

Processes generating waste
The used drums were first drained of residues and then placed on spickets to be washed with a strong caustic soda solution before a water wash. Solvent was then added to the drum to remove washing stains and used to wipe the outside of the drum to remove grease, oil and/ or the label.

Waste stream description

  • solvent fumes
  • used solvent
  • used caustic solution
  • wastewater
  • solid waste

Traditional Process and New Process

Cleaner production initiatives

Benefits recommended and implemented
The new automated drum laundering line provides higher pressure caustic and water washes, improving internal and external cleanliness. It can launder a larger variety of drums that were previously disposed to landfill.

A further benefit of the EPA assistance has been that savings in running costs have allowed the purchase and installation of a fully automated shot blasting system for the removal of flaky paint. This equipment further improves productivity and quality while reducing manual handling.

Benefits

Environmental  
Solvents
  • Solvent usage reduced by 76%.
  • Used solvent disposal reduced by 63% but likely to increase significantly now that old stock has been disposed.
Energy
  • Energy consumption reduced by 17% by incorporating the use of a maxi-therm boiler system rather than heavy-duty electrical elements.
Wastewater
  • Wastewater discharge reduced by 6000 L p.a.
Solid waste
  • Solid waste to landfill reduced by 40% as a greater variety of drums can be reconditioned.
Economic  
Solvents
  • Solvent purchases reduced by $6000 p.a.
  • Solvent disposal costs reduced by $2000 p.a.
Energy
  • Electricity cost savings of $1300 p.a.
Solid Waste
  • Solid waste charges reduced by $800 p.a.
Productivity
  • Drum reconditioning capacity increased from 130 drums/day to 400 drums/day.
Payback Period 6 months.
OHS
  • No wiping down of drums with solvent.
  • Reduced fumes in factory from flammable solvent.
  • No manual handling of drums full of solvent.
  • Fewer repetitive strain injuries.

Where to find additional information

Eco-efficiency Team
Environment Protection Authority
GPO Box 2607
Adelaide SA 5001

Phone: (+61 8) 8204 2004
www.epa.sa.gov.au

Mr Pat Ryan
Director
CRS Container Reconditioning Services
180a Cavan Rd Dry Creek SA 5094

Phone: (+61 8) 8359 7011

This page was last modified 14-08-2007
 

:: top of page ::
 
 

 
   Telephone: (61 8) 8204 2000 Freecall (country): 1800 623 445
   Email epainfo@epa.sa.gov.au 
   77 Grenfell Street (SA Water House), Adelaide SA 5000

     EPA SA Central
Privacy Disclaimer Copyright search home latest news media releases about us contact us publications site map