Water quality is assessed as being in good, moderate or poor
condition by interpreting water chemistry data in the context
of protecting environmental values. >>
More
Ecological health is assessed in spring and autumn. We use macroinvertebrates
for this purpose because they provide a relatively simple way
to assess the health of an aquatic ecosystem. >>
More
Water chemistry is measured each month (or every 3 months in
remote locations). We measure chemical indicators because when
they reach a certain level they can cause stress or toxicity to
animals and plants in an ecosystem. Some indicators can also indicate
if the water is suitable for drinking water or for activities
such as swimming. >> More
We collect two samples of macroinvertebrates, one from riffle
(or flowing water) habitat and one from edge (still water) habitat.
The diversity of the macroinvertebrate community is used to describe
ecological health as being in good,
moderate or poor
condition.
Go
here to find out how we classify ecological health in streams.
Ecological health assessment for May 2006
| Habitat |
Ecological health
|
| Edge |
Moderate
|
| Riffle |
Poor
|
The biological assessments of both habitats sampled in autumn
2006 rated below reference condition. This compares to previous
years when the site has generally been rated in a good condition.
The edge habitat had 22 different macroinvertebrate species collected.
However, only 48 individuals were present in the whole sample.
Usually between 200-500 specimens are present in most samples,
highlighting the very low number of macroinvertebrates in the
edge habitat. The edge habitat was notable by the absence of molluscs,
shrimps, dytiscids and hydrophilid beetles, mayflies, stoneflies
and leptocerid caddisflies.
In comparison, the riffle had 8 different types of about 8,890
individual macroinvertebrates collected from the whole sample.
But the majority of these were small, unidentified hydrobiid snails,
an introduced hydrobiid snail called Potamopyrgus antipodarum
and oligochaete worms. The riffle included two flow dependent
macroinvertebrates (blackfly larvae Simulium ornatipes and
predatory caddisfly Cheumatopsyche sp. 2) but lacked crustaceans,
chironomids, mayflies, stoneflies and leptocerids.
The salinity of the water was about 3,500 mg/L when sampled,
so salt effects may be partly responsible for the poor ecological
health classification for the site.
The only unusual finding at the site was the presence of polychaete
worms from the family Spionidae, indicating that this lowland
stream site may be influenced by estuarine tidal effects on occasion.
Download ecological health data
The indicators that are measured in the Cygnet River at Bark
Hut Road are nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), turbidity and
salinity.
The concentrations of these indicators are used to classify the
water chemistry as being in good,
moderate or poor
condition, according to the needs of aquatic ecosystem protection.
Go here
to find out how we organise and classify the chemistry data.
Water chemistry classification for April to September 2006
|
Indicator
|
Classification
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
The nutrients and turbidity were all classified as good in this
sampling period. The grazing and cropping landuses in the Cygnet
River catchment can result in nutrients being washed into the
river, mainly during winter months; however the unusually dry
conditions during this period have probably kept the nutrient
concentrations low. The Kangaroo
Island NRNM Board has identified important issues that affect
water quality in this catchment and the Board is working with
landholders to address them.
>> Archived results