Water quality is assessed as being in good, moderate or poor
condition by interpreting ecological health and water chemistry
data in the context of protecting environmental values. >>
More
Ecological health is assessed in spring and autumn. We use macroinvertebrates
for this purpose because they provide a relatively simple way
to assess the health of an aquatic ecosystem. >>
More
Water chemistry is measured each month. We measure chemical indicators
because when they reach a certain level they can cause stress
or toxicity to animals and plants in an ecosystem. Some indicators
can also indicate if the water is suitable for drinking water
or for activities such as swimming. >>
More
We collect two samples of macroinvertebrates, one from riffle
(or flowing water) habitat and one from edge (still water) habitat.
The diversity of the macroinvertebrate community is used to describe
ecological health as being in good,
moderate or poor
condition.
Go
here to find out how we classify ecological health in streams.
Ecological health assessment for June 2006
| Habitat |
Ecological health
|
| Edge |
Good
|
| Riffle |
Good
|
The good ratings for The Deep Creek in autumn 2006 are similar
to previous results for this site and consistent for a stream
that lies in a National Park. Note that this creek can, however,
still be impacted by land-use impacts because approximately half
the catchment upstream from the site is in the park and the rest
consists of tree plantations and agricultural lands with cropping
and grazing.
The edge habitat was biodiverse with 47 different types of macroinvertebrates
present in autumn 2006. The most common forms included oligochaete
worms, hydrobiid snails, marsh beetles from the family Scirtidae
and amphipods (Austrochiltonia australis).
The riffle was also comprised of a rich assemblage of 50 different
macroinvertebrates, the most common being hydrobiid snails, oligochaete
worms and Austrochiltonia australis.
The site included many macroinvertebrates that are rare or only
found at high quality sites in the State. Some examples include
numerous caddisflies (e.g. Orthotrichia bishopi, Maydenoptila
rupina, Hydroptila scamandra, Lingora aurata,
Taschorema evansi), stoneflies (Austrocerca tasmanica,
Illiesoperla mayii, Dinotoperla evansi), chironomid
larvae from the genus Stempellina and neuropteran larvae
from the family Osmylidae.
The site is impacted by the presence of an introduced hydrobiid
snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) and brown trout were also
noted in June 2006. Limiting the spread of these and other introduced
species in the catchment would assist in maintaining the high
environmental value of this stream, along with measures to protect
stream flow and water quality.
Download ecological health data
The indicators that are measured in The Deep Creek are nutrients
(nitrogen and phosphorus), turbidity and salinity.
The concentrations of these indicators are used to classify the
water chemistry as being in good,
moderate or poor
condition, according to the needs of aquatic ecosystem protection.
Go here
to find out how we organise and classify the chemistry data.
Water chemistry classification for April to September 2006
|
Indicator
|
Classification
|
|
|
Moderate
|
|
|
Poor
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
The nutrients and turbidity levels at this site tend to vary
without a clear seasonal pattern. The total nitrogen is often
elevated, although this is probably related to suspended sediments
because the soluble oxidised nitrogen is usually quite low. The
turbidity is usually considered to be good, although it has been
higher than expected for a creek flowing through a conservation
park. This may partly be explained by the elevated dissolved organic
carbon that can affect turbidity measurements (refer to the chemistry
data for download). Further investigation is required to help
explain the results.
>> Archived results