Find A Document:

The licence fee system (LFS) is based on ‘user pays’ and ‘polluter pays’ principles, where licence fees reflect the EPA’s regulatory effort as well as the amount and type of pollutants discharged to the environment.

The LFS enables the EPA to:

  • recover, in an efficient and equitable manner, the costs we incur due to the environmental management of licences
  • provide an economic incentive to reduce pollution.

The system was introduced on 1 July 2008 following extensive consultation with industry and the community on its development.

The review gave all licensees the opportunity to submit their comments through a survey. The results of this survey are available in the report, Review of the EPA’s licence fee system (758.2 KB PDF). Following the survey, minor amendments (22 KB PDF) were made to the Environment Protection Regulations 2009

Components of the LFS

The total licence fee consists of three components:

The LFS model was determined so that the split between these components is:

  • 1% flat minimum fee
  • 39% resource efficiency fee
  • 60% environmental management fee.

Flat minimum fee

The flat minimum fee covers the basic administration work common to all licences.

Environment management fee

The environment management fee reflects the regulatory effort, which is aligned to environmental risk, for managing an activity. This fee is based on the activity that incurs the highest fee of all activities carried out on a site.

Waste transport, dredging and earthworks drainage, if applicable, are an additional charge.

Resource efficiency fee

There are two types of resource efficiency fees, which only apply to a subset of licences:

  • Pollutant load fees are for the discharge of key pollutants from the licensed site to the environment (air or water). Emission thresholds apply to ensure that only significant emissions are captured.
  • Water reuse fee for the discharge of fresh water to the marine environment.

Further information

Last modified: 05/06/2012 03:25 pm

Did you find the information useful?   Yes   No

Leave the following field blank - it's used to trap automated spam-bots.

Your email address:

Your feedback will much appreciated if you would like to give us more information.

All fields are optional

Accessibility - easy to find information? Excellent Good Fair Poor
Clarity - easy to understand? Excellent Good Fair Poor
Relevant - meets your needs? Excellent Good Fair Poor
Presentation - was the design appealling? Excellent Good Fair Poor
How often do you visit the website? Daily Weekly Monthly Occasionally
How can the website be improved?
Limit 500 chars
Name
Email
Phone
Captcha
This is a special question to help stop spam.
    Cancel