|
Water quality links:
Home
What is water quality?
Direct to data
Monitoring program & assessments
Major threats & issues
Legislation & programs
Other resources & initiatives
Publications
Glossary
<< Horseshoe Bay main page
<< back to Adelaide Southern Beaches
|
|
Water quality assessment
Water quality at Horseshoe Bay jetty is assessed as being in
good, moderate or poor condition by interpreting water
chemistry and algal data. >>
More
Water quality classification for October 2005 to March 2006
|
Indicator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good
|
NA
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
|
Good
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
|
Good
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
|
Good
|
Good
|
NA
|
|
|
Poor
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
|
Poor
|
NA
|
Poor
|
|
|
NA
|
Good
|
NA
|
Notes NA = not applicable
For this sampling period chlorophyll (a) was classified as poor.
Previously it has been classified as moderate Elevated chlorophyll
(a) is probably due to the effect of excess nutrients most likely
as a result of fertilisers or animal wastes being washed off nearby
catchments during storms.Heavy metals were classified as poor
due to slightly elevated copper concentrations. These heavy metals
can come from runoff from roads and galvanised iron roofs. All
other classifications are consistent with previous results.
Water quality classification for April to September 2005
|
Indicator
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good
|
NA
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
|
Good
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
|
Good
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
|
Good
|
Good
|
NA
|
|
|
Good
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
|
Poor
|
NA
|
Poor
|
|
|
NA
|
Good
|
NA
|
Notes NA = not applicable
Heavy metals were classified as poor, which is most likely due
to urban runoff containing heavy metals washing off roads and
galvanised iron roofs.
This page was last modified 31-07-2007
|