|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes NA = not applicable The water quality monitoring results for this period were generally consistent with, or lower than previous seasonal results for this site. Further monitoring is required to determine whether the slightly lower nutrient concentrations may be an early indication of a trend, or may be a response to the drought. Ammonia, oxidised nitrogen and chlorophyll (a) were classified as poor at Site 4. Total nitrogen was also elevated. Turbidity decreased from previous results and was classified as good. Elevated ammonia, oxidised nitrogen, total nitrogen and chlorophyll (a) results are probably due to industrial discharges into the river (such as those from Penrice Soda Products and Bolivar Wastewater Treatment Plant), historical contamination from the now-closed Port Adelaide Wastewater Treatment Plant and the large number of stormwater drains that discharge into the Port waterways. Heavy metals were classified as poor (copper and zinc), which
are most likely due to urban runoff containing heavy metals washing
off roads and galvanised iron roofs into the marine environments
during rain events. In July 2006, a new analytical method for
heavy metals was introduced, which can detect metals at much lower
concentrations than before. It is now possible to compare concentrations
to National Water Quality Guidelines confidently. Download water quality graphsDownload water quality dataWhat is being done to improve the condition of the Port waterways?
Reports
Links
This page was last modified 25-09-2007 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
:: top of page :: |
|
|
|
|