Archived water quality assessments
Ecological health
We collect two samples of macroinvertebrates, one from riffle
(or flowing water) habitat and one from edge (still water) habitat.
The diversity of the macroinvertebrate community is used to describe
ecological health as being in good,
moderate or poor
condition.
Ecological health assessment for December 2005
| Habitat |
Ecological health
|
| Edge |
Good
|
| Riffle |
Moderate
|
Both the edge and riffle habitats are usually rated in good condition.
The heavy rainfall in November altered the stream channel at this
site, modifying available habitat. This pulse of heavy flow may
have led to the reduction in diversity seen in the riffle on this
occasion.
Ecological health assessment for May 2005
| Habitat |
Ecological health
|
| Edge |
Good
|
| Riffle |
Good
|
Water chemistry
The indicators that are measured in Sixth Creek are nutrients
(nitrogen and phosphorus), turbidity and salinity.
The concentrations of these indicators are used to classify the
water chemistry as being in good,
moderate or poor
condition, according to the needs of aquatic ecosystem protection.
Water chemistry classification for October 2005 to March 2006
|
Indicator
|
Classification
|
|
|
Poor
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
The oxidised nitrogen classification is poor. The elevated oxidised
nitrogen is probably due to fertilisers or animal wastes being
washed into the creek during storms. It is possible that elevated
oxidised nitrogen could lead to excessive algal growth, particularly
during warmer months. The classifications for this sampling period
are consistent with previous results (see graphs
below). There are several projects and programs being run which
are designed to improve water quality in Sixth Creek. These are
being coordinated through the EPA's Watershed
Protection Office and the Adelaide
and Mt Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board.
Water chemistry classification for April to September 2005
|
Indicator
|
Classification
|
|
|
Poor
|
|
|
Moderate
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
|
|
Good
|
The amount of nitrogen can be increased by fertilisers or animal
wastes being washed off farms during storms or due to effluent
outfalls. The poor nitrogen results for the recent samples are
consistent with previous results.
This page was last modified 13-09-2007
|