EPA navigation

State of the Environment Reports
 

Reporting Frameworks
 

State of the Environment Report links:

Home

2003 Report

Reporting frameworks

Education

Publications

Environmental catalogue

Links

 

Environmental reports are starting to emerge at all levels of government as well as in the corporate world. The type of framework used for an environmental report depends on who it is produced for and its given purpose. The framework facilitates the organisation and presentation of information to define the issues addressed in the report. Below is a brief overview of several types of reports that have emerged as well as the frameworks they use.

State of the Environment (SoE) Reporting Frameworks

In Australia, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development's (OECD's) 'pressure-state-response' (PSR) model is most commonly the basis for SoE Reporting.

In South Australia and nationally, an expanded version of the OECD-PSR model, the driving force-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) model is used to take into account driving forces or causes for the change as well as the impacts to environmental, social and economic systems.

To simplify our interpretation of a complex environment, SoE reports are structured around a number of environmental themes, issues and indicators.

Environmental themes are broad categories by which you can classify the environment. In South Australia seven themes are used: atmosphere, inland waters, coasts and marine, land resources, biodiversity, human settlements as well as natural and cultural heritage.

Issues are the main topics of concern within each of the themes. For example, under the atmosphere theme, the major issues are air quality, ozone depletion and the enhanced greenhouse effect.

For each issue, environmental indicators are used to measure the condition of the environment with respect to that particular issue. Environmental indicators help track changes in the environment. These key measures illustrate trends and changes within a system. Indicators simplify the reporting process. They can be measured and reported on frequently and their information can be gathered and interpreted in a uniform manner. When applying the PSR Model (or adaptations of the model) there are three types of indicators:

  • pressure indicators - describe the pressures from human activity that affect the environment
  • state (or condition) indicators - measure the quality of the environment and the functioning of important environmental processes
  • response indicators - identify the human actions or efforts that have been made to address pressures on the environment.

A set of indicators has been developed at the national level in an attempt to standardise the reporting process across Australia. A comprehensive suite of key environmental indicators was developed by independent experts for each environmental theme, from which a set of core indicators (www.deh.gov.au/soe/publications/indicators/core-indicators.html) were selected. The national core indicators, wherever possible, should be included in an SoE Report to allow comparability between jurisdictions and data sharing between local, state and federal government. Additional indicators are then included according to the particular reporting requirements of a jurisdiction.

At a regional scale a report Local and Community Uses (www.environment.gov.au/soe/publications/indicators/community.html) was prepared to assist councils to identify potential environmental indicators at the regional level.

Sustainability Reporting Frameworks

Sustainable Development is 'development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs'. Sustainable development recognises the interdependence of environmental, social and economic systems and promotes equality and justice through people empowerment and a sense of global citizenship.

The indicators used for sustainability reporting differ from state of the environment reporting as they are based on different models that combine social, economic and environmental trends, and the inter-relationships between these systems.

Some examples of sustainability reporting frameworks and indicators include The Natural Step (TNS), Sustainability Counts and the Indicators of Sustainable Development prepared by the Division for Sustainable Development. Sustainability frameworks have also been developed for specific industries and agendas including The Montreal Process (www.mpci.org) for the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests, Sustainable Fisheries, and Agricultural Sustainability Indicators for Regions of South Australia (www.pir.sa.gov.au).

Further details on some Sustainability Reporting Frameworks:

The Ecological Footprint

The Ecological Footprint framework varies from State of the Environment reporting or sustainability reporting as it is a model that is based on acknowledging ecological limits and places less emphasis on the social and economic aspects of sustainability. The Ecological Footprint is a resource accounting and environmental education tool that inverts the traditional concept of 'carrying capacity' (the population a given region could support) and instead seeks to determine what total area of land is required, regardless of where that land is located, to sustain a population, organisation or activity.

Corporate Reporting Frameworks

Corporate environmental reporting is about the communication of information to the community concerning a private or public organisation's performance. Further details on two Corporate Reporting Frameworks:

This page was last modified 25-09-2007
 

:: top of page ::
 
 

 
   Telephone: (61 8) 8204 2000 Freecall (country): 1800 623 445
   Email epainfo@epa.sa.gov.au 
   77 Grenfell Street (SA Water House), Adelaide SA 5000

     EPA SA Central
Privacy Disclaimer Copyright search home latest news media releases about us contact us publications site map