Skip to Content

Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Regional Summary
2016 Aquatic Ecosystem Condition Report

Locations

A total of 38 sites were sampled from the Western Mount Lofty Ranges in autumn and spring 2016. These sites were located throughout the region, ranging from the Light River in the north to Back Valley Creek in the south. Rainfall patterns in the region are dominated by winter rains and annual averages range from about 1,000 mm at Mount Lofty to less than 400 mm at Mallala in the Mid North. The generally low hills and flat plains of the Mount Lofty Ranges have been extensively cleared since European settlement, and only about 15% of the original vegetation remains (Environment Protection Authority 2008). Land-use is dominated by agriculture (mostly stock grazing and cereal cropping) and residential living, with patches of remnant native vegetation largely confined to conservation parks, steep hills, gullies, along creek-lines, and as part of roadside vegetation.

Key points

  • 38 sites were sampled across the region in 2016
  • 52% were given a Very Good or Good rating and 48% were in Fair, Poor or Very Poor condition
  • The most significant streams were generally located from the higher rainfall, mid to high altitude, and more vegetated parts of the region and had flowing riffle habitats present in at least one season sampled (eg First, Tunkalilla, Callawonga, The Deep and Boat Harbour creeks on the Fleurieu Peninsula and First, Deep, Sixth, Brownhill and Scott creeks in the Adelaide Hills)
  • The better streams were distinguished by the presence of many rare, sensitive and flow dependent macroinvertebrates and showed evidence of low to moderate nutrient enrichment
  • The other streams were generally located in more developed agricultural and urbanized areas and showed evidence of significant nutrient enrichment (eg excessive growths of aquatic plants, filamentous algae or phytoplankton), often lacked flowing habitats, typically had moderate to high salinity, most had limited riparian habitats, and they frequently supported pest plants and fish
  • The poorer streams lacked rare and sensitive species and were dominated by generalists and tolerant macroinvertebrates
  • Riparian habitats of most streams were degraded due to the presence, and often dominance, of weeds and introduced grasses in the understorey vegetation

Findings

Sites monitored in the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges during 2016 were considered to be in a Very Good to Very Poor condition. No sites were considered to be in an Excellent condition. Of the sites assessed, two sites (5%) were in Very Good condition with little change to animal and plant life; 18 sites (47%) were considered to be Good condition with only minor changes to animal and plant life; 8 sites (21%) were in Fair condition with moderate changes to animal and plant life, and some changes to the way the ecosystems functioned; 9 sites (24%) were in Poor condition with evidence of major changes in animal and plant life; and 1 site (3%) was in a Very Poor condition with evidence of severe changes in animal and plant life and major loss of ecosystem function.

The sites rated Very Good and Good were located in the higher rainfall catchments (>600 mm annual rainfall) from the Fleurieu Peninsula (eg First Creek, Tunkalilla Creek, Callawonga Creek, Boat Harbour Creek, The Deep Creek, Balaparudda Creek and Myponga River) and Southern Mount Lofty Ranges (eg First Creek, Sixth Creek, Brownhill Creek, Scott Creek, Jacobs Creek and Little Para River).These sites were characterized by their moderately diverse to diverse macroinvertebrate communities, presence of several rare, sensitive and/or flow-dependent species, they mostly had well vegetated riparian zones, and most had low to occasionally moderate nutrient concentrations when sampled in 2016.

The sites rated in Fair condition showed evidence of nutrient enrichment (eg high nutrient concentrations, large growths of algae and/or aquatic plants, high chlorophyll concentrations) but were distinguished by the presence of only a few rare or sensitive species. The Fair sites tended to occur in streams with reasonable riparian habitats and some remnant native vegetation in their catchments but receive significant runoff from agricultural or peri-urban land uses. These included parts of several major (e.g. North Para and Sturt rivers) and numerous smaller streams from the Adelaide Hills (e.g. Cox, Aldgate, Brownhill and Tanunda Creeks), and two streams from the Fleurieu Peninsula (First Creek and Campbell Creek downstream from Talisker mine).

The Poor sites were from largely cleared catchments with riparian habitats consisting mainly of introduced plants with a few isolated gum trees. They included Back Valley Creek from the Fleurieu Peninsula and sites from the Light, South Para and Torrens rivers and Millers, Inverbrackie and Pedler creeks from the Southern Mount Lofty Ranges. These sites had few aquatic macroinvertebrates present and lacked rare or sensitive species, and often showed evidence of damage caused by high salinity levels and nutrient enrichment.  

The Very Poor site was from Walker’s Creek within the North Para River catchment near Freeling. It was characterized by the lack of a functioning riparian zone, poor water quality including high salinity and gross nutrient enrichment, and limited range of only a few pollution tolerant macroinvertebrates.

The aquatic macroinvertebrate communities of most streams were dominated by tolerant species and included lower numbers of rare and sensitive species. Chironomids (including Paramerina, Procladius, Cricotopus, Thienemanniella, Tanytarsus and Chironomus), amphipods (Austrochiltonia) and snails (Potamopyrgus, Angrobia and Physiella) were particularly common from the streams sampled. Where flowing water (eg riffles) was present, large numbers of blackfly larvae (Austrosimulium furiosum and Simulium ornatipes), a chironomid (Rheotanytarsus), mayflies (Atalophlebia and Thraulophlebia), stoneflies (Illiesoperla and Dinotoperla) and caddisflies (Cheumatopsyche and Taschorema) were often recorded. The slow to non-flowing pools usually provided habitat for water mites, waterbugs (Micronecta, Microvelia and Anisops), beetles (Sternopriscus, Platynectes and Scirtidae), yabbies (Cherax destructor), shrimp (Paratya), introduced snails (Physiella and Potamopyrgus), mosquitoes (Aedes and Anopheles), flies from the Family Dixidae, mayflies (Cloeon and Tasmanocoenis), caddisflies (Hellyethira, Lectrides and Triplectides), stoneflies (Dinotoperla and Riekoperla), damselflies from the family Coenagrionidae and dragonflies from the family Telephlebiidae.  

Nearly all sites sampled showed some evidence of nutrient enrichment, either by the high concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus in the water or by the presence of large growths of filamentous algae, phytoplankton, and/or aquatic plants. Many creeks and rivers had significantly disturbed riparian zones with cropping or other introduced grasses and weeds often being the dominant vegetation on the banks. The few streams with more extensive riparian zones were generally located in conservation parks or hilly country where most of the overstorey was dominated by native trees and shrubs. Agricultural runoff carrying nutrients, salt and fine sediment, with the latter exacerbated by bank erosion caused by stock damage, were also significant stressors affecting the condition of many of the degraded streams in the region.  

The median water quality data from sites sampled during 2016 indicated that streams from the Western Mount Lofty Ranges were generally fresh (salinity of about 436 mg/L), well oxygenated (8.2 mg/L), alkaline (pH>7) and with moderate to high concentrations of nutrients such as nitrogen (0.78 mg/L) and phosphorus (0.04 mg/L).

Special environmental features

Flowing streams in the region provided more habitat complexity and supported a wider range of aquatic species than those that ceased to flow or dried up for at least part of the year. A range of rare and sensitive species that frequent freshwater, flowing riffle habitats were collected from the better sites, including stoneflies (Newmanoperla thoreyi, Illiesoperla mayii and Riekoperla naso), mayflies (Tasmanophlebia, Centroptilum, Offadens, Nousia fuscula, Atalophlebia and Thraulophlebia), dragonflies (Hemigomphus and Austrogomphus), caddisflies (Ulmerochorema, Taschorema, Anisocentropus, Atriplectides, Oxyethira, Lingora, Leptorussa, Orthotrichia, Triplectides similis and members of the Family Tasimiidae), beetles (Simsonia and Sclerocyphon), blackflies (Paracnephia, Austrosimulium and Simulium melatum), and a chironomid (Riethia).

A few species were not collected during this sampling period but have been recorded from the region in recent years (2011, 2013 or 2015), including thaumaleid flies (Austrothaumalea), chironomids (Harrissius, Stempellina and Harnischia) and a caddisfly (Apsilochorema). Given the lack of recent land use changes or significant disturbances (eg fire or drought) over this time period, they probably still occur in parts of the less disturbed streams in the region that were not sampled in 2016.

Two threatened species of fish were also recorded from the better streams during 2016, including the Mountain Galaxias (Galaxias olidus) and Climbing Galaxias (Galaxias brevipennis). Several other significant fish have also been recorded from a number of coastal streams in the region during recent fish surveys, including Southern Pygmy Perch, Congolli, Freshwater Catfish and various eels and lampreys (Hammer et al. 2009).

Pressures and management responses

Pressures

Management responses

Insufficient natural water flows in some creeks resulting from water extraction and climate variability

Through water allocation planning the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board seeks to manage a sustainable water supply for the region so that there is enough water available for everyone (including the environment) even in drought conditions.

Widespread introduced weeds in the riparian zone at some sites

The Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board has several pest plant (weed) mitigation and control programs. They work closely with landholders, including local government, to control weeds on their property and to help stop the spread to other properties and waterways.

Livestock having direct access at some sites (causing sediment erosion and adding excessive nutrients)

The Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board’s land management program encourages and promotes managing land to improve water quality. This includes incentives for waterway (eg stream and creek) and wetland fencing to exclude or limit stock from entering riparian zones.

Limited riparian zone vegetation at some creeks (reducing habitat quality, increasing sediment erosion)

The Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board’s land management program encourages and promotes managing land to improve water quality. This includes incentives for revegetation programs around waterways and wetlands and stock exclusion as well as educating landholders about the importance of riparian vegetation in managing soil erosion. The Board also partner with local government to deliver a number of watercourse revegetation projects across the region.

Stormwater runoff containing high nutrient and sediment loads discharging to some creek (causing habitat disturbance, algal growth and aquatic weeds)

The Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board has a well-developed stormwater quality improvement, harvesting and reuse program which has installed (and maintains) gross pollutant  (and silt) traps in several watercourses across the region to catch litter, debris and silt in order to minimise impacts and damage to seagrass and reef ecosystems in the receiving marine environment. Stormwater captured is also treated through artificial wetlands across the region which act as suspended solid and nutrient filters; these wetlands also provide important habitat for many native species.

Nutrient inputs to some creeks from numerous diffuse sources (potentially leading to excess growth of algae and aquatic weeds)

The Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board land management program encourages and promotes managing land to improve water quality. This includes working with industry and landholders to ensure efficient use of fertilisers and discuss ways to reduce runoff of nutrients into waterways.  

Saline groundwater inflows to some creeks

The Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board has installed telemetered groundwater monitoring stations at key locations within the region. These are monitored for level and salinity; unusual results (such as high salinity influxes) are investigated.

Failing onsite wastewater treatment systems in some catchments, adding nutrients through shallow subsurface flows or overland flows to creeks (leading to algal growth)

Failing onsite wastewater treatment systems in the Mount Lofty Ranges Watershed are being addressed by improving maintenance of existing systems, upgrading to a more effective system, or via connection to a local government Community Wastewater Management Systems or to an SA Water sewer network, where these are available. The Mount Lofty Ranges Waste Control Program is addressing failing onsite systems by identifying and facilitating upgrades. This effective program is being delivered by the Adelaide Hills Council in partnership with the AMLR NRM Board, SA Water, Department of Health and the EPA.

Wastewater discharges to some creeks, adding excessive nutrients and organic matter (leading to algal growth and aquatic weeds)

SA Water Wastewater Treatment Plants at Hahndorf and Heathfield

SA Water assess and undertake scheduled process improvement actions at wastewater treatment plants, with the aim to reduce environmental risk and ensure operations are compliant with EPA licence conditions.

Further information

This aquatic ecosystem condition summary report is based on monitoring data collected by the EPA and prepared in conjunction with the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board

Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management Board Environment Protection Authority South Australia